In our report in August 2019 we examined the pressure that the Council was under to establish a Clean Air Zone around the city centre. Following a long delay caused by the General Election and other Government priorities, the Council has now been given the go-ahead to introduce its alternative proposals. The text of the Council’s press release is below:
The government has written to the Council in support of local proposals which set out a series of measures to reduce Nitrogen Dioxide emissions, benefiting residents through cleaner air and better health.
It means Coventry does not need a Class D charging Clean Air Zone (CAZ), which would have seen higher emission vehicles charged for entering a large area of the city.
The written confirmation was received in the past few days.
In a letter to Council Leader, Cllr George Duggins from the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Rebecca Pow MP, it states:
“I am pleased that you have submitted updated modelling in order to meet your direction and that the Council has subsequently worked closely with my officials to refine your options…On the basis of the evidence provided, I am content that you should proceed with implementing your preferred alternative option to a charging CAZ…”
The legal direction from the government means that Coventry will need to submit a final full business case by 19 June which will feature more details on the schemes now due to get underway.
Ahead of the June deadline the Council will hold further discussions with residents on the proposed measures.
Cllr Jim O’Boyle said that the news is excellent and that it reflected the overwhelming views of local people and businesses.
He said: “In June last year we clearly set out to the government why a CAZ would not work in Coventry and is not needed. More than six months on they have confirmed what we have always said. What we all know is that it is absolutely vital that we tackle air pollution – and particularly vehicle emissions.
“We know the health risks of Nitrogen Dioxide and that is why we want to address this through a package of measures including: highways engineering; improved traffic management; cycle routes; travel planning; upgrading bus fleet; supporting a shift to electric taxis; and encouraging the uptake of electric cars and installing more charging points.
“We have a lot do.”
The Council has been working closely with the government’s Joint Air Quality Unit throughout and the Council’s positions has consistently argued against a CAZ.
Cllr Jim O’Boyle added: “This is excellent news and means any CAZ that would have been imposed – affecting 82,000 residents or 25 per cent of our residents – has been stopped.
“A CAZ in Coventry would have potentially created worse air quality on many residential roads bordering the charging zone as drivers would have sought alternative routes to avoid the CAZ.”
The Council will be continuing to consult with local people over the coming weeks about the plans being identified. These include:
- Capacity improvements on the B4106 through Spon End and Junction 7 of the Ring Road, including improved routes for pedestrians and cyclists;
- Opening Upper Hill Street onto the Ring Road, giving left in/left out access to the Ring Road via the clockwise on-slip road at Junction 8 and allowing Barras Lane to be closed;
- Closure of Barras Lane between the A4114 Holyhead Road and Coundon Road/Upper Hill Street allowing the removal of the signals at the Barras Lane / Holyhead Road junction;
- Reducing the number of polluting vehicles by introducing restrictions on the eastern section of the A4114 Holyhead Road on the approach to Junction 8;
- Construction of a segregated cycle route linking Coundon with the city centre along Coundon Road and Upper Hill Street;
- Engagement initiative (travel planning) for schools, businesses and communities along Holyhead Road Corridor;
- Banning the right turn from Cash’s Lane onto Foleshill Road
- HGV ban on part of Foleshill Road;
- Assigning electric buses to Foleshill Road.
Coventry has been awarded grant funding of £24.5m to implement the schemes.
We say well done to the Council for saving us from an unwanted policy!
Why isn’t hydrogen fuel pushed more in Coventry as it was the capitol of car manufacturing it could be the centre to start the use of hydrogen instead of electricity.
It’s up to industry to come up with the vehicles and filling stations. While batteries have the disadvantage of slow charging/refilling, they have the advantage that an electricity supply can be found in practically every building. Where are the hydrogen storage tanks? Maybe hydrogen makes sense for long distance vehicles (trains as well as HGVs) but batteries make more sense for vehicles never far from their base (e.g taxis, buses and urban delivery).